By: Felix Labinjo
This is my interpretation, as a layperson, of the guidance issued on behalf of the Senior Presiding Judge and the Senior President of Tribunals: “ You must now go over all the blogs that you have...
View ArticleBy: Corrupted Mind
Sheer lunacy. As a judge you can give any number of talks, lectures and speeches on almost any topic but for some unbeknownst reason blogging is off limits. It doesn’t make any sense. The funny thing...
View ArticleBy: ObiterJ
Thank you for adding your view to this matter and for the links to my blog. Whilst Article 10 European Convention permits some interference with freedom of expression in order to protect the judicial...
View ArticleBy: Bystander
Thank you for your support. The blog will continue come what may, even if I have to do some Jesuitical tinkering to remove my judicial fingerprints from it. I am taking advice from wise and respected...
View ArticleBy: The Justice of the Peace
Enough comments have been made here and elsewhere on the content of this so called guidance but nobody seems to have considered why a very learned senior judicial figure should publish such...
View ArticleBy: Simon Carne
Not only does the guidance seem to be ill-advised, it also seems to be ambiguous and illogical – a far worse sin in (some) legal circles. I refer to the wording which says “must not identify themselves...
View ArticleBy: ObiterJ
One suspects that the “guidance” is really aimed at the lower echelons of the system. Even the Senior Presider cannot really tell the Lords Justice of Appeal or the Justices of the Supreme Court what...
View ArticleBy: sid30837
Reblogged this on <a href="http://pcsosid30837.com/2012/08/16/183/" rel="nofollow">sid30837</a>.
View Article
More Pages to Explore .....